POWER BANK BUYER TOOL · SUPPLIER SCORECARD

Power Bank Supplier Evaluation Scorecard

Compare suppliers with the same evidence-based framework across manufacturing, engineering, cell/PACK, quality, compliance, samples, commercial execution and change control.

Rule: no evidence, no full points. A critical project risk should be closed even when the total score is high.

Supplier Scorecard · 8 Decision Areas

Rate each area from 0–5, then apply the section weight. Keep the same method across competing suppliers and close any critical risk before approval.

01 · Manufacturing Reality — 10%

Factory role · lines/equipment · production control · traceability · CAPA.

02 · Product Engineering — 15%

Cell/PACK · PCB · PD/PPS · cable/thermal · DFM/NPI.

03 · Cell / PACK Control — 20%

Cell model · lot traceability · PACK architecture · substitution control.

04 · Quality System — 15%

IQC/IPQC/final control · functional/aging tests · defect handling · CAPA.

Power bank manufacturing evidence for supplier evaluation

Manufacturing & Quality Evidence — verify real production control, traceability and corrective action.

Power bank engineering review for supplier evaluation

Engineering & Product Control — check cell/PACK, charging, structure, thermal and validation capability.

05 · Compliance Evidence — 10%

Exact-SKU report matching · battery/transport evidence · market/labels. Certification →

06 · Sample Discipline — 10%

Sample ID/revision · test/deviation records · golden-sample control.

07 · Commercial Execution — 10%

Quotation scope · MOQ/lead time · project ownership · response. MOQ & Lead Time →

08 · Change Control & After-Sales — 10%

BOM/component notice · buyer approval · defect response · corrective action.

Critical-Failure Rule

Section score = (average rating ÷ 5) × section weight. No evidence, no full points. Close uncontrolled substitution, weak traceability, missing change control or mismatched compliance/transport evidence before supplier approval.

Evidence to Verify

High scores should point to evidence another reviewer can inspect: documents, drawings, samples, test results, traceability records or factory observations.

Power bank supplier factory and engineering evidence

Factory & Engineering

Power bank cell and document control evidence

Cell & Document Control

Power bank supplier quality system evidence

Quality System

Power bank supplier commercial execution evidence

Commercial Execution

Approval Signals & Red Flags

Good Signs

✓ Exact cell and configuration identified.
✓ Engineering uses measurable data.
✓ Samples carry IDs and revisions.
✓ Documents match the proposed SKU.
✓ Deviations and changes are controlled.

Red Flags

× “A-grade cell” with no controlled model.
× “Supports PD” with no profile/test evidence.
× One document set claimed for unrelated SKUs.
× No sample/BOM/firmware revision state.
× Silent component substitution is treated as normal.

Power Bank Supplier Evaluation FAQ

Should the cheapest supplier receive the highest score?
No. Compare price only after product scope, assumptions and deviations are visible.
How should unsupported supplier claims be scored?
Do not award full points. Record the missing evidence and keep the item open until it can be verified.
Can the scorecard replace a factory audit?
No. Use the Factory Audit Checklist for deeper verification of manufacturing, cell/PACK, quality, traceability and change control.
What if a supplier scores well but fails one critical control?
Treat the critical control separately. A high total should not override unresolved substitution, traceability, compliance or change-control risk.
How should buyers compare ZEROSET with other manufacturers?
Use the same criteria and evidence requirements for every supplier and verify exact-SKU documents, samples, traceability and production controls.